Pages

Showing posts with label M.K. Gandhi. Show all posts
Showing posts with label M.K. Gandhi. Show all posts

Thursday, February 7, 2019

19 February, 1916: Gopal Krishna Gokhale Death Anniversary

The Legacy of Mahatma Gokhale by M.K. Gandhi (Extracts)

(Written for the occasion of the Foundation-day of the Bombay Bhagini Samaj, in memory of the late Gopal Krishna Gokhale, on his first death anniversary – the 19th February 1916)

It seems that Mahatma Gokhale functioned as if the words addressed by Krishna to Arjuna had been addressed to him by India, the mother of us all, and had been made by him the guiding principle of his life. For it will be readily admitted that whatever he did, whatever he enjoyed, whatever he sacrificed, whatever he gave in charity, whatever austerities he performed, he dedicated them all to his mother land.

What is the moral of Gokhale’s life? What legacy has he left for us?
These questions were answered by Gokhale himself in his last words to the members of Servants of India Society...“Don’t waste your time in writing a biography or setting up a statue, but pour your whole soul into the service of India. Then only shall you be counted among her true and faithful servants.” 

Gokhale wrote articles in the quarterly of the Sarvajanik Sabha in Poona. He imparted fresh lustre to the Fergusson College by his work there as a professor. He tendered evidence before the Welby Commission. All India thus recognised his intrinsic worth. He so deeply impressed Lord Curzon by his ability that Viceroy feared Gokhale as he feared no one else. Gokhale covered himself with distinction as a member of the Supreme Council in Calcutta. He served on the Public Service Commission in spite of his failing health. On this and many other aspects of his work others have written with greater qualifications than I can claim to possess. Again, the lesson which, in my opinion, we have to learn from his life cannot clearly be deducted from these activities.

Gokhale’s life was that of man of religion. Every thing he did was done in the spirit of a devotee as I can testify....It would not be improper to say that his very doubt was inspired by religion. A man who leads a dedicated life, who is simple in habits, who is the very image of truth, who is full of humanity, who calls nothing his own – such a man is a man of religion, whether he himself is or is not conscious of it. Such was Gokhale as I could see during the twenty years of my friendship with him.
 
Fearlessness was a very important element in Gokhale’s composition. Indeed this virtue is an indispensable quality in a man of religion. There was a reign of terror in Poona subsequent to the assassination of Mr. Rand and Lt. Ayerst. Gokhale was in England at the time and referring to it he spoke to a Committee of influential members of British Parliament. Some statement made in that speech could not be substantiated later on. Therfore, when Gokhale returned to India, he tendered an apology to the European officials whom he had charged with misconduct and thus incurred the displeasure of some ignorant people who called him a coward and advised him to retire from public life. He rejected this advice with the noble words:-
            “Public duties undertaken at the bidding of no man, cannot be laid down at the desire of any one. Whether one works on a higher plain or a lower one is a matter of small importance. One is always glad of the appreciation by the public of what one has done............ But it is not the highest purpose of existence, never really the highest. If it comes, to give the words of Herbert Spencer, well; if not, well also, though not so well.”

            Gokhale did his duty conscientiously and never wasted a single selfish thought on what view the public would take of his action. I believe, he had the capacity to cheerfully mount the gallows for the country’s sake, if necessary. I know to mount the gallows more than once was very much easier for him than face the practical situation. But he never so much thought of turning his back to it.  

            ...We cannot all acquire learning like him and the learned men do not always serve the people. But can all cultivate virtues like courage, truthfulness, patience, humility, a sense of justice, straightforwardness and perseverance and dedicate them to the nation. This is the spirit of a devotee. This is what Gokhale meant when he spoke “Public life being spiritualised.” All who conduct themselves in such a spirit of dedication will always see their way clear before them and claim a share in the legacy which Gokhale has left for us all. Such devoted workers will be endowed with all such gifts as they need as the Lord has promised, and Gokhale’s life is an illustration of that promise having been abundantly fulfilled.  


Source: Jayaprakash Narayan (I-II) Instalment, MSS, NMML

Wednesday, March 1, 2017

Civil Disobedience Movement and aftermath

Gandhi-Irwin Pact- 5th March 1931
Dandi March- Starts on 12th March 1931
Salt Satyagraha- 5th April 1931

Report on Civil Disobedience Movement
Chapter III


Civil Disobedience Begins

Gandhiji reached his destination on April 5th. On the morning of the following day, he committed technical breach of the salt laws by collecting a handful of muddy salt from the sea from which he later prepared pure salt. Knowing Gandhiji’s plans, Government had taken pains to destroy previously all free salt on the coast by thoroughly mixing it up with dirt and mud.

               After Gandhiji had collected his handful of salt, he formally authorised the country to start civil disobedience by preparing, collecting or selling contraband salt. There was immediate and unbounded response to Gandhiji’s call. In every province except Assam, where there are no facilities for salt-making, salt began to be prepared in hundreds of places amidst great popular enthusiasm. At first, batches of chosen volunteers, after passing in procession through the streets of towns and villages, assembled at appointed places and actually went through the process of salt manufacture surrounded and cheered by thousands of citizens. Where the sea-coast or other large salt sources were accessible, the breach of the laws was not confined to chosen volunteers alone. It at once became a mass movement, that is, whole populations took part in it. Gandhiji himself participated in such mass disobedience a couple of days after the initiation of the movement. In Bombay, hundreds of thousands of men and women rushed to the beach to fetch sea water which they evaporated into salt in their homes. In areas where salt could be prepared with difficulty, batches of volunteers toured through villages, carrying accessories of salt- making and holding meetings in every village, they prepared salt in the meetings in which the villagers also participated. Thus they spread the movement far and wide. With the beginning of the movement, Government repression, which had already begun, assumed a fiercer aspect; it soon transcended even the bounds of its own laws. Before the first week of Satyagrah was over, reports came of deliberate maltreatment of Satyagrahis. Forcible wresting of salt from the hands of volunteers, sometimes resulting in the drawing of blood, became a common occurrence not only in Gujarat but everywhere. At one place, boiling saline water (from which salt was subsequently to be prepared) was poured over the body of a Satyagrahi. Only two days after the eventful 6th of April, while volunteers were preparing salt in Delhi, a force of policemen appeared on the scene and caught hold of the volunteers and dragged them away over thorny brambles and stony ground. The same day while salt was being prepared the third time the police repeated this behavior. As a result of this, all the volunteers were bleeding and badly bruised, five of them becoming completely senseless…….

Source: A.I.C.C. papers, NMML Archives



On Withdrawal of Salt Concession by Government
All India Congress Committee.
Swaraj Bhawan, Allahabad.

Jhang, September 27th, 1931.
My dear Vallabhbhai,

                             I enclose a copy of a letter I am sending to Emerson, also a copy of a notice issued by the Deputy Commissioner of the Shahpur District withdrawing the salt concession from the Salt Range. I did not want to write to Emerson direct but then I felt that great delay would occur if I referred the matter to you first. Hence the action I have taken. I hope you do not mind.
                              Sometime ago you issued a warning to people abusing the salt concession. I believe this applied to Karachi or parts of Sind but I am not sure. So far as I remember, the Salt Range in the Punjab had nothing to do with it. It seems to me that it is highly improper for Government to withdraw the salt concession in this way whatever the facts regarding abuse might be. I am informed that there has been no such abuse. People from Shahpur District tell me that as a matter of fact full advantage has not been taken of the concession. It may be that there have been minor breaches by individuals. In any event the burden of proof rests entirely on Government and they must prove their case before they take action.
                               I find that repression here is going strong and a very large number of persons, chiefly young men, are being proceeded against under various section. Many are being tried under Sec. 302 I.P.C.  (the murder section) coupled with some other sections, simply because of a speech. I read through the speeches in one such case. It was a report taken by a head constable and most of it was strenuously denied as incorrect. But even accepting it for what it was worth it is an extraordinary state of affairs to proceed under Sec. 302 for a speech.
                               This is just and instance. In a variety of other ways local officials here are misbehaving. Unfortunately the Punjab P.C.C. is not an efficient or a capable body and does not do much. It is hardly possible to make it realise what should be done and what should not be done.
                                        I notice from the papers that you are still in Bombay. I do not know what your future programme is. I am sending this letter to both places.
                                                                                   Yours sincerely,
                                                                                    Sd/- Jawaharlal.
          Sardar Vallabhbhai Patel.




                                                                                                                                                                                                     Enclosure
All India Congress Committee
Swaraj Bhawan, Allahabad.

                 Jhang, September 27th 1931
Dear Mr. Emerson,
                  I have been shown a copy of a notice which the Deputy Commissioner of Shahpur District is said to have issued withdrawing the salt concession from the whole area covered by the Salt Range. I enclose a copy of this notice which bears the date: 10.8.31. I do not know if this date is correctly given in the copy as the notice has, I understand, only recently been generally published for public information.
                    The salt concession was an explicit an important part of the Delhi Settlement and its withdrawal raises vital issues. So far as my information goes there has not been any of it in Shahpur District, but in any event we would have expected that any allegations would have been brought to the notice of the Congress President, as you have done in some other cases, before any action was taken by Government. If the date of the notice 10th August, as is mentioned in the copy, Mr. Gandhi was here at the time and could have been informed of it.
                    In the ordinary course our President, Sardar Vallabhbhai Patel, would have written to you about this matter and I would not have troubled you about it. But in view of the importance of the matter and the desirability of avoiding delay I have ventured to write to you direct. I am of course informing our President and I shall be obliged if you will write to him in answer to this letter of mine. You need not trouble to write to me.
Yours sincerely
(Sd) Jawaharlal Nehru
H.W.Emerson Esq.
Secretary Home Department,
Government of India, Simla.






Enclosure
Notice

       The concession accorded to the residents of the Salt Range as a result of the discussions between Lord Irwin and Mr. Gandhi has been seriously abused in as much as that
(1)       Salt has been removed otherwise than on foot:
(2)    Within a few weeks quantities many times in excess of the normal annual consumption of the population in the villages in immediately adjoining areas have been removed;
and

(3)       It is established that a trade in salt so removed has sprung up in bazaars in towns many miles away from the source.
The concession has been completely with drawn throughout the wholes area of the Salt Range.
This notice is put up for the information of all in order to make widely known the real facts which made necessary the withdrawal of the concession.

Sd.  I.E. Jones,
Deputy Commissioner
Shahpur District
G. n. 10.8.31




Source : A.I.C.C papers, NMML archives